Editorial Policy
Our commitment to honest, accurate, and helpful casino reviews.
Our Editorial Standards
At InteracCasinos.org, we take our responsibility to readers seriously. Every piece of content published on this site adheres to strict editorial guidelines designed to ensure accuracy, fairness, and genuine value for Canadian players.
Independence
Our editorial team operates independently from our commercial partnerships. While we earn commissions from casinos we recommend, this never influences our ratings, rankings, or reviews. A casino that pays higher commissions does not get preferential placement: rankings rest on the published terms, licence and payment behaviour we can document.
How We Gather Information
This is a desk-research site. What we publish comes from documents a reader can check for themselves: each operator's own published bonus terms, cashier pages and licence statement; each bank's own published Interac e-Transfer fee and limit pages; Interac's published roster of participating institutions; and payment processors' own materials alongside public payment-industry sources.
Every bank record on this site carries a provenance flag and a date. Four of our twenty-seven bank records are marked verified, meaning the figures were read off the bank's own published page on the date shown. The rest are marked researched, and the bank guide says so on the page rather than presenting the figures as checked. Where we hold no citable source for a fee or a limit, we say that too instead of printing a plausible number.
What We Do Not Claim
We do not hold deposit and withdrawal test records for the operators listed on this site, and nothing here should be read as a payout test result. Which Interac payment processor a given casino uses is affiliate-reported and rotates, so it is labelled reported rather than confirmed. Whether a bank declines card and debit payments to gambling merchants is our editorial reading of observed behaviour at most institutions; at TD, RBC, Scotiabank, BMO and CIBC we quote the clause in the bank's own card agreement instead. Where an institution publishes a figure on a page that would not load for us, we link the page and quote nothing from it, and say so by name and date. If we later run and document real payment tests, we will publish the records alongside the claim, not the claim alone.
Accuracy
We strive to ensure all information on our site is accurate and up-to-date. Casino terms, bonus offers, and policies change frequently, and we regularly review and update our content. If you notice any inaccuracies, please contact us so we can investigate and correct them.
Balanced Reviews
We report both positives and negatives for every casino we review. No casino is perfect, and our readers deserve to know about potential drawbacks as well as strengths. We believe this balanced approach helps players make truly informed decisions.
Regular Updates
The online gambling industry evolves rapidly. We continuously monitor the casinos we recommend and update our reviews when circumstances change – whether casinos improve, deteriorate, or introduce new policies that affect players.
Contributors
Content is written and reviewed under a named byline, and contributors are required to disclose any potential conflict of interest. Where a page carries a reviewer's name, that reviewer is accountable for the sourcing on it.
Questions About Our Editorial Process?
If you have questions about how we create our content or concerns about any information on our site, please reach out via our contact page. We welcome feedback and are committed to maintaining the highest editorial standards.